Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Avon layoffs eliminate 400 jobs, shut down Ireland operations

Avon layoffs will include more than 400 jobs cuts worldwide, just three months after the 1,500 layoffs in December, when Avon pulled out of Vietnam and South Korea.

By Associated Press / April 8, 2013

Actress and advocate Salma Hayek speaks at the second annual Avon Communications Awards: Speaking Out About Violence Against Women luncheon, March 7, New York. It is unclear what Avon's latest round of downsizing and layoffs means for programs like this one.

Bebeto Matthews / AP / File

Enlarge

Avon is eliminating more than 400 positions and abandoning or restructuring smaller or underperforming businesses in Africa, the Middle East and Europe, including an exit from Ireland.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

The company said Monday that the job cuts, which equate to about 1 percent of Avon's 39,100 employees, will occur across all regions and segments. It is part of a turnaround plan under CEO Sheri McCoy, with the goal of achieving mid-single digit percentage revenue growth and $400 million in cost savings by 2016.

Avon expects to complete almost all the cuts before year's end.

The New York company will take charges of around $35 million to $40 million before taxes and expects annualized savings of between $45 million and $50 million.

The jobs cuts come on top of the 1,500 positions trimmed in December, when the company announced that it was exiting Vietnam and South Korea.

The direct seller of beauty products has been struggling to turn around its business at home and in emerging markets. It has also wrestled with a bribery probe in China that began in 2008 and has since spread to other countries.

In its most recent quarter, Avon Products Inc. posted a wider fourth-quarter loss as it marked down the value of its Silpada jewelry business and restructured. It was still better than Wall Street had expected, however, and McCoy, who took over Avon one year ago, said there were signs that business was stabilizing.

Avon Products shares rose 35 cents, or 1.7 percent, to close at $20.61 Monday.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/q78SUr7VwVo/Avon-layoffs-eliminate-400-jobs-shut-down-Ireland-operations

rondo suspended bay bridge band of brothers presidents george washington russell westbrook horsetail falls

Lohan tells Letterman rehab is a 'blessing'

In this Tuesday, April 9, 2013 photo released by CBS Entertainment, actress Lindsay Lohan talks to David Letterman about her upcoming trip to rehab, her guest star roles in the series "Anger Management" and film "Scary Movie 5" and more during the "Late Show with David Letterman," (11:35 PM-12:37 AM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network, in New York. (AP Photo/CBS Entertainment, Jeffrey R. Staab)

In this Tuesday, April 9, 2013 photo released by CBS Entertainment, actress Lindsay Lohan talks to David Letterman about her upcoming trip to rehab, her guest star roles in the series "Anger Management" and film "Scary Movie 5" and more during the "Late Show with David Letterman," (11:35 PM-12:37 AM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network, in New York. (AP Photo/CBS Entertainment, Jeffrey R. Staab)

(AP) ? Lindsay Lohan is going into rehab next month, but first she had to face David Letterman.

In an appearance taped for Tuesday's "Late Show," Lohan was pressed by Letterman about her upcoming rehab stint. She faces a 90-day stay as part of a plea deal in a misdemeanor traffic accident case.

Letterman tried to draw Lohan out, asking how many times she'd been in rehab, how this time would differ, and what she's being treated for.

Lohan looked uncomfortable and said she didn't expect Letterman's line of questioning.

But she said that she wants to be healthy and focus on what she loves ? her work. She added that she looks at rehab as "a blessing and not a curse."

CBS released a partial clip of the interview before it aired.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-04-09-TV-Lohan-Letterman/id-420bdd44db1948e59371a2ae5a29da76

modern family how i met your mother Jordan Pruitt real housewives of new jersey Kanye West sex tape emmys emmys

Boundaries/Transparency in Non-marriage relationships


General Relationship Discussion Although anyone can post anywhere on Talk About Marriage, this section is for people interested in general relationship and marriage advice.


Old Today, 02:57 PM ? #1 (permalink)

Forum Supporter

?

Join Date: Dec 2011

Posts: 1,522


OK I have a question for my favorite relationship community.

I feel pretty solid on boundaries and transparency in marriages. You're committed for life, certain things are not acceptable. For me that looks like no texts to other men, no GNOs to the bar, full transparency with phones, emails, passwords etc.

I don't feel like this is something that you just "flip on." ie, I don't expect that a woman goes on vegas trips with her single girlfriends on her bachelorette party, and then never again after she's married. I feel like there should be a progression towards this as the relationship advances.

My question is, how does this look?

I am now in month six of a relationship, and this weekend was kind of pivotal. It kind of forced me to rethink some of the communication I've been having with the opposite sex.

The girl had some behaviors when we were casually dating that would be issues to me if we were married. Meaning she did a lot of GNOs to the bar, a handful of guy friends, trips to see guy friends. I completely understand that, seeing as how she was single for 8 years and I wouldn't expect anyone I was casually dating to alter their life. As we became exclusive she dialed back a lot of that stuff. She didn't go on a few road trips with guys to go to concerts, she didn't go on a vacation with her single girlfriend. She still does GNOs on occasion, and she still has some guy friends she talks to. I was pretty much OK with that up until this weekend.

We exchanged the L word, and after meeting some of these guys this weekend, I feel like I'm at the point where I don't think one on one communication is really wise.

We chatted about it today, I mentioned how I felt, and mentioned as well that I also have girls that I talk to that is probably not appropriate. We both came to the same conclusion, we think we should discuss it further but neither of us is ready to say we're not going to communicate with opposite sex friends yet. I also think it would be a little much after 6 months to ask someone to not go drinking with their same-sex friends anymore, even though I think it's a risky behavior.

So what is your take on this? I know not everyone is anti-GNO, for those of you that are, when is an appropriate time for that to stop? When is it appropriate for private communication to stop with opposite sex friends? How do you transition to all of these boundaries gracefully? And if you're not married, is it appropriate to ask for someone else's phone/email/web passwords?


Last edited by COguy; Today at 04:02 PM.

COguy is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:37 PM ? #6 (permalink)

Member

?

Join Date: Apr 2013

Posts: 38


Quote:

OK I have a question for my favorite relationship community.

I feel pretty solid on boundaries and transparency in marriages. You're committed for life, certain things are not acceptable. For me that looks like no texts to other men, no GNOs to the bar, full transparency with phones, emails, passwords etc.

I don't feel like this is something that you just "flip on." ie, I don't expect that a woman goes on vegas trips with her single girlfriends on her bachelorette party, and then never again after she's married. I feel like there should be a progression towards this as the relationship advances.

My question is, how does this look?

I am now in month six of a relationship, and this weekend was kind of pivotal. It kind of forced me to rethink some of the communication I've been having with the opposite sex.

The girl had some behaviors when we were casually dating that would be issues to me if we were married. Meaning she did a lot of GNOs to the bar, a handful of guy friends, trips to see guy friends. I completely understand that, seeing as how she was single for 8 years and I wouldn't expect anyone I was casually dating to alter their life. As we became exclusive she dialed back a lot of that stuff. She didn't go on a few road trips with guys to go to concerts, she didn't go on a vacation with her single girlfriend. She still does GNOs on occasion, and she still has some guy friends she talks to. I was pretty much OK with that up until this weekend.

We exchanged the L word, and after meeting some of these guys this weekend, I feel like I'm at the point where I don't think one on one communication is really wise.

We chatted about it today, I mentioned how I felt, and mentioned as well that I also have girls that I talk to that is probably not appropriate. We both came to the same conclusion, we think we should discuss it further but neither of us is ready to say we're not going to communicate with opposite sex friends yet. I also think it would be a little much after 6 months to ask someone to not go drinking with their same-sex friends anymore, even though I think it's a risky behavior.

So what is your take on this? I know not everyone is anti-GNO, for those of you that are, when is an appropriate time for that to stop? When is it appropriate for private communication to stop with opposite sex friends? How do you transition to all of these boundaries gracefully? And if you're not married, is it appropriate to ask for someone else's phone/email/web passwords?

Married or not a person is entitled to their privacy. As a woman, I may have private conversations with my friends about any number of things that are private. The same goes for my husband. My husband and I don't have anything blocked so it would be easy to pry. But we don't because we trust each other, and respect the other persons privacy.

There are compromises on both parts in every successful relationship. I feel it's unfair to ask a person to drop friends, or things he/she may enjoy. Trust and respect are essential to any relationship.

It'd be a good idea for you to figure out why you want to be so controlling.

Sussieq is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Today, 08:34 PM ? #13 (permalink)

Forum Supporter

?

Join Date: Dec 2011

Posts: 1,522


Quote:

I am not against GNO. I'm also not with the idea of cutting off half the world to benefit one person. I do have some male friends. If we are going to meet, my husband is invited. If we talk on the phone, my husband is informed. If he chooses to not go or has a concern, I listen and make a decision. We have only had one instance where it became a concern because the guy was being disrespectful about my husband, and I told him not to contact me again after my husband shared his thoughts.

Kathy your response really surprises me, I've always respected your advice and viewed it as insightful. As a married person, I would in no way be OK with opposite sex one on one meetings. GNO to meat markets I'm not comfortable with. I guess I've heard too many stories and seen too much, I'm just not open to those kind of arrangements. I'm interested to see why you think that is OK though.

I'm not opposed to HAVING opposite sex friends I suppose, just anything that would create private conversations or one on one activities.

COguy is online now ? Reply With Quote





Find a Therapist:





Source: http://talkaboutmarriage.com/general-relationship-discussion/71161-boundaries-transparency-non-marriage-relationships.html

kelis dick clark dies ibogaine jamie moyer bone cancer hossa the cell

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

keeping kids busy in a small home | American Family Now

A common question about living in a small home is, how do you live in peace with each other? I guess when you are forced to be near your spouse and kids you are more likely to be at odds? Seeing as how everyone I talk to says that even in a big house you still have to learn to be at peace with each other, I?m thinking that living in a small home doesn?t change relationships. If you love each other you find more opportunities to spend time together, likewise, if you fight all the time you?ll find more opportunities to fight, but living in a small space doesn?t make you fight!

SONY DSC

Adapting to a small home requires a change in perception about a number of activities though, and entertaining your kids is one of them. How do I stay sane with four kids in a roughly 200sq ft house? I began to answer this type of question in my post answering your questions, but I had intended to make a whole post out of it, so we?ll go into more depth here.

Being a stay-at-home-mom of four children between the ages of 1 and 6 is not easy, but I will not pretend that having a bigger home would make it any easier. They are full of energy, ideas, and conversation, and no matter what your home looks like they need attention, all the time. But I knew that going into this whole motherhood thing, so I?m not complaining. Being a stay-at-home-mom is hard work, but I wouldn?t trade it for the world. My kids mean so much to me, and I pray God helps me to do the best I can to raise them to be healthy, independent, godly individuals. That?s the longterm goal, but as we mothers all know, life is lived moment to moment. My focus for this post is, how do our kids spend their time on an average day, and how do I enjoy them, while living in a small home?

SONY DSC

Invest in Lego! Haha. Seriously though, planning out and selectively choosing entertainment (with or without your kids depending on their ages) makes a big difference in how each day goes. We have a lot of toys available to us in accessible storage, but there are certain activities our kids enjoy the most, or spend the most time doing. I prioritize those favorite activities by making them more accessible to the kids, and by making sure they have time to spend on them. When kids stay busy doing creative, mind-consuming activities, they are working their busy brains, spending time (usually) peacefully together, and sometimes I even have a few minutes to spend with one child alone or to do an activity by myself (those dishes don?t do themselves!).

SONY DSC

(Four-year-old Girlie is working on number recognition while wearing an eye patch for lazy eye treatment)

Lego is a great example, but every family has there own favorite. I have found that if you plan space accordingly, you can make room in a small home for most any activity. Puzzles, board games, books, crafts, dress-up supplies, even musical instruments (which Papa has!). Creative storage of totes, use of cupboards, shelves, and closets, will ensure that your favorite activities are made priority in your small home. We have a set of shelves and drawers in our living area, totes in one small child?s bed and under the dining room table, a larger tote on the porch, and additional games, books, and toys in our storage camper which aren?t used as often.

Don?t forget the outdoors! When you have a small home, the outdoors becomes a priceless environment. Health professionals say children should get at least 60 minutes of free time outdoors. On most winter days our kids spend 30-60 minutes outdoors, and in the summer we count how many hours they spend indoors instead, which is far less. We are lucky enough to have an environment which is relatively safe for kids to play in unattended for a few minutes. I try to make it a rule for my 4 and 3 year olds that they can?t go out by themselves, they have to be together or with their 6 year old brother. Even if they get into trouble, it is easier to tell when two are yelling at each other than when one is alone!

SONY DSC

(painting in pajamas ? what better way to spend a Saturday morning?)

Sending the kids outside is good for their physical and mental health and growth, so it is a priority to us, just like finding good quality entertainment indoors. But what about TV? First of all, if you haven?t figured it out yet, we do have a TV and local channels, as well as a DVD player in our bedroom. With our new electrical system we can use them anytime we want. I have heard that most kids watch a few hours of TV, plus time playing video games every day. Papa and I give our kids one and a half hours of screen time each day. Like discussing food, I feel somewhat vulnerable telling you how much they watch. Some of you probably think that is way too much, perhaps others feel guilty that theirs watch more. That is not my intention. Nevertheless, our kids watch one movie or three half hour PBS shows each day, Monday through Friday, except some Wednesdays when we are more busy and don?t have time for it. When they watch TV I am almost always washing dishes and making phone calls since it?s quiet.

SONY DSC

What about the family time that comes with living in a small space? I should hope that ours isn?t any different than a family living in an average sized home. As a stay-at-home-mom, I spend significantly more time with our kids than Papa does, but we both make it a priority to spend our days together as much as possible. On occasion the kids will spend a night or a few hours away from home with someone in the family, but most of the time we do things as a unit. On an average day that means reading together, family worship, games, chores, crafts, and of course tickling and cuddling! Usually we do arrends together once a week (laundromat, post office, library, bank, etc.), and on the weekends we often spend more time outdoors than during the week. Much of this together time is not scheduled, but fits in between other activities naturally.

And then there is homeschooling. How much time do we invest? Where do we do it? Where do we keep our books? In this post, I talked quite a bit about the where?s and how?s of our homeschool, which we spend roughly 5-10 hours a week doing together. This week we had to make a minor change in where we keep our homeschool books though. Previously we kept them on a book shelf in the living room. Turns out that?s a very attractive place for a one year old to pull books from. Because Chickie is not responding to discipline (another spirited child?) and I would rather not spend my days putting them all back on the shelf again and again, I cleared out a spot on a shelf in my room for them, putting my less frequently read books in the storage camper until summer at least. That way our homeschool things are still nearby, but not easy to reach by little fingers.

SONY DSC

And what about the baby? Twelve-month-old Chickie finds plenty to do. She is still in the exploration stage, where most toys don?t entertain her for very long because her attention gets drawn to the many people and activities going on around her. We keep age-appropriate toys readily available, but she really enjoys playing with her big sibs, and exploring any drawers or cupboards or boxes I let her get into. Right now she still takes one, sometimes two naps a day, for about one hour each, which is often when the older kids get projects out that they don?t want her exploring. I also spend time nursing and cuddling her, or carrying her around while I cook, play, or teach. When I need two hands and someone is working on an important project that she can?t get into, Chickie enjoys sitting in her homemade highchair with a stimulating activity, like a cup and spoon to stir with or play drums! (And speaking of Chickie, this post happens to not have any pictures of her, but Friday?s post will have plenty of cute ones!)

SONY DSC

(playing with Papa?s electronic tools and materials)

To sum up, here?s how our kids spend their days:

  • ?? ?Easy access to stimulating, creative activities
  • ?? ?As much outdoor time as they want during mostly good weather (above 20 degrees Fahrenheit and mostly dry)
  • ?? ?Up to one and a half hours of screen time a day, usually ?educational?
  • ?? ?One to two hours of planned educational activities, four days a week, September through May
  • ?? ?Entertaining baby sister
  • ?? ?Lots of together time in between

SONY DSC

And all of this, while living in a 200sq ft home with a family of six. If you live in a small home, please share your experience ? how does your family spend an average day?

Source: http://americanfamilynow.org/?p=1425

austin rivers sweet home alabama etch a sketch the host hoodie hoosiers temperance

Viber for Windows Phone 8 update adds free VoIP calling with HD ...

DNP Viber for Windows Phone 8 updated with free VoIP calling with HD audio

After several months as a watered down messaging app, Viber for Windows Phone 8 is finally catching up to its Android and iOS counterparts. Starting today, the redesigned VoIP application now supports free calls with HD audio, lock screen notifications and the ability to pin conversations to your Start screen. This Metro modern UI version of Viber also includes photo sharing and group conversations with up to 40 participants. So, if your call plan is running low on minutes and the latest version of Skype just isn't cutting the mustard, head on over to the source link to give this free VoIP software a whirl.

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/02/viber-windows-phone-8-update/

matt ryan matt ryan att wireless Mother Jones cars Bacon Number Kate Middleton photos

Restaurant review: Price doesn't always match food, service at ...

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Valter Nassi returns to Salt Lake City?s dining scene with Valter's Osteria, a chic restaurant that pays homage to his Tuscan homeland, serving antipasti, house made pasta, seafood and steak.

The name Valter Nassi resonates with a many Utah diners. He is equal parts restaurant impresario and beaming host, brimming with hugs, handshakes and flair. His popularity with diners stems from his erstwhile years at the award-winning Cucina Toscana.

But he broke away in 2012 to create Valter?s Osteria. His namesake restaurant is located in the space left vacant by the departed Metropolitan restaurant. The plush remodel is a remarkable transformation from what was previously a far sterner, austere and modern aesthetic. Apparently modelled on a Tuscan granary, the update breathes a warmer more welcoming character into the building. It?s an impeccably appointed dining room, featuring a bar at the front, private dining to the rear and whizzing servers in sharp attire.

?

HH

Valter?s Osteria

Food ? HH

Mood ? HH

Service ? H

Noise ? bb

Valter Nassi returns to Salt Lake City?s dining scene with a chic restaurant that pays homage to his Tuscan homeland, serving antipasti, house made pasta, seafood and steak.

Location ? 173 W. 300 South, Salt Lake City; 801-521-4563

Online ? valtersosteria.com

Hours ? Monday-Thursday, 5:30 to 10 p.m.; Friday-Saturday, 5:30 to 11:30 p.m. Bar opens at 4:30 p.m. Closed Sunday

Children?s menu ? No

Prices ? $$$$

Liquor ? Full bar

Reservations ? Yes

Takeout ? No

Wheelchair access ? Yes

Outdoor dining ? No

On-site parking ? Pay lot nearby, valet

Credit cards ? all major

For such an upscale venture, the menu is surprisingly large. Time and again I witnessed diners happily defer to their server or Nassi himself. A common recommendation is a multi-course dinner taking in an antipasti, pasta, a meat course and dessert. That?s the path I took for my first meal at Valter?s, kicking things off with an antipasti of Fette Di Anatra & Pate? Di Nana ($16) ? a sublime plate of sliced, fennel crusted duck breast, served with duck pate and plums. The dish was fabulous with tender duck, rich creamy pate and a sweetness from the plums.

The delivery of the dish, though, presented the first of many curious service issues. It was delivered and presented to the table on one plate ? before being redeployed using the silver service technique of spoon and fork ?to each diner. Maybe it was our waiters shakiness and nervousness, but the vibe felt awkward, I?d rather have shared the single plate with my dining companion; especially in the context of a restaurant that wants to showcase its affable host, welcoming you into his house, sampling the food of his Tuscan homeland.

The fussy service continued with various items such as the Traditional Caesar Salad For Two ($16) being prepared tableside. Due to the tight spacing of some tables though, this approach is unfeasible in certain areas of the dining room ? waiters having to wander quite far from a diner?s table to accomplish their task. This extra demand placed on the waitstaff seemed to stretch them too thin at times and left me scratching my head as I watched the complexity unfold.

Individual faults persisted through my meals. On one evening our waiter abruptly left our table right while I was speaking and placing my order, and on the same night a souffle arrived to the table more as a chocolate molten cake ($15), and a not so great one at that. On a subsequent visit an antipasti of Carpaccio Di Bue Al Porcino E Tartufo ($25) ? beef carpaccio with mushrooms and truffles ? sounded decadently exciting. Sadly it arrived without the truffles. Despite my waiters sincere apologies for the lack of truffles the price remained eye-wateringly unchanged ? but the carpaccio was first rate.

On a brighter note, a fresh house-made pasta sampler ($20) was downright stunning. I eagerly devoured the trio that included a fistful of light gnocchi in spicy arrabiata sauce, two plump ricotta and spinach ravioli and a heavenly creamy capellini. Hands down the best I?ve sampled in Salt Lake. It was so good I could even get around the hefty price tag.

Which brings us to another cautionary note, Valter?s is a spendy restaurant. The multi-course dinner for two ? with a single drink each from the full bar? was slightly north of $200 with tax and tip.

Entrees are some of the priciest in the downtown area. Grilled Piedmontese Flat Iron ($38) was recommended more than once, so I eventually bit. Served medium rare, medallions of beef encircled a measly pile of undercooked potatoes ? the beef had fantastic flavor but was marred by excessive saltiness. For the lofty price, the dish left me wanting far more.

Scaloppine Di Vittello Al Limone Con Capperi ($34) suffered similarly. While the milk fed veal in buttery, citrus sauce with capers (and a side of spuds and beans) was competent enough, the price tag demanded something closer to exemplary than merely acceptable. Slightly better value was Salsicce E Mare ($34) ? sliced, sweet Italian sausage layered over grilled calamari, scallops, shrimp and sauteed spinach all in a garlicky broth. Again, good, but not exceptional as the price point might infer.

story continues below

For dessert, a supremely rich and enjoyable hot chocolate served with lemon raisin biscotti comes complementary, and was a pleasant surprise treat to end the meal. If you want to push the boat out a little further though, skip the aforementioned chocolate cake for the Tiramisu ($8.50), heaving with tons of cream.

There is unquestionably some special food to be enjoyed at Valter?s. There?s also a thoroughly happy crowd who enjoy the lavish attention and showmanship that the eponymous host brings to proceedings. At times, though, I felt like an interloper at a private party. Everyone seemed to be having a great time, while I couldn?t get past repeating service quirks and the odd stumbling dish. And at the price point Valter?s Osteria is asking, its doubtful I?ll be back enough times to be invited to the party.

features@sltrib.com

Copyright 2013 The Salt Lake Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/entertainment2/56075078-223/valter-dining-price-restaurant.html.csp

jason campbell doobie brothers jennie garth peter facinelli marques colston golden state warriors free agents nfl 2012 milwaukee bucks